Are We Too Busy To Build a Big Society?
In light of the recent benefits debate Richard Wilson asks will people have time for the Big Society?
Thanks for taking the time to read this; I know how busy you are. And, if the latest statistics from the Henley Centre are anything to go by, you could be about to get much busier. Particularly if a double dip recession pushes us all into a scramble for fewer jobs and less money.
While many in government are heralding the recent spikes in volunteering requests as evidence that people want to get more involved, more recent evidence challenges this. The truth is no one is quite sure. This could be the start of a sea change, driven by rising unemployment rates and people keen to supplement their CVs. Or, it may be a blip in an otherwise overpowering trajectory towards time poverty and individualism (1). But it matters. It matters a lot. Time is the currency that fuels community, society and progress. We are, as a society and as individuals, how we spend our time.
The reason that successive governments have focussed on new politics, empowerment and Big Society respectively is that they, as politicians, are all too aware of how communities across Britain have become hollowed by the force of historically high employment and greater social pressures to be fitter, happier and more productive. 50 years ago Britain’s communities were knitted together by people (often women) who lived in and built our communities. One of the most direct consequences of widespread economic liberation is that the time once invested in our communities has now been transferred into the wider financial economy. No one is suggesting that we should return to the starkly prejudicial times of the 1950s; but these developments have consequences.
Our drive to better ourselves and offer more to the next generation has meant we do more, putting ever greater pressures on our time. As the Henley data shows, in 2009 64% of people felt they did not have enough time to get things done (2) and the recession has taken this figure even higher in 2010. Compounding this are a range of wider social trends such as increased time spent commuting, shopping and travelling abroad alongside other trends symptomatic of individualism such as a reduction in those playing team sports and an increase in individual sporting activity (e.g. gym and running) all of which directly take time out of the community.
I do not argue here that any of these things are bad – indeed often quite the contrary. However they are having profound consequences for society and present considerable challenges for those of us who want to see a bigger society. These challenges will not be addressed by a spike in volunteering, especially when considered against the government’s announcements to cap benefits to ensure “work always pays”, and to “fix” the issue that working ‘is not a rational choice for many poor people’. Such arguments, though not without merit, simplify a complex social problem and add weight to the forces driving people out of their communities and out of the Big Society.
Time is the great leveller: whether young or old, rich or poor, you have one life of around 79.9 years. If we want stronger and more resilient communities we must spend time within and as communities. If we want to solve global problems like climate change we must build the structures that enable us to act and connect as a global society. If we want to tackle important issues, such as making plans to manage the financial crisis we now face, we must allocate time to such thinking. And, if we genuinely want to be happier, we must prioritise the time to connect with whatever it is that makes us happy; be it walking in nature, being with our family or faith.
If the government wants a Big Society it is going to have to ensure that our society can be restructured into one which provides powerful incentives for people like us to reallocate our time. We need to understand how we spend our time right now, and what it is that drives our current life choices. And we need to find and adopt the policies and practices that allow us to reinvest our time, our most precious resource, sensibly and responsibly*. Then, and only then, will we see the Big Society flourish. Right you’d better get back to work!
* I’ll be reviewing some examples of innovative projects that work within societal time constraints in a blog post in the near future. If you’ve got suggestions, please leave them in the comments below.
(1) Harrison, M, and Singer, M, (2009)”The time squeeze generation” IIPS.
(2) (2009) “What the Citizen Wants” tns bmrb.
Hi Richard, I am sure you know the Time Banks already and you might want to check out http://www.justaddspice.com.
Best wishes, Sandra
It may be that virtual communities are important too – we may not have to always meet face-toface to get the benefit or support each other. Is there any evidence that virtual social networks benfit people’s health in the same way as face-to-face links do?
Thanks Sandra and Brian – both important points.
Sandra appologise for my ignorance but have TimeBank done any work on getting people (and society) to do personal time audits to see if they are allocating time in the way that makes most sense – not being shunted from one urgent thing to another? Also have they done work on hard-wiring reflective capacity to ensure time is being spent wisely.
In terms of health I’m not sure – be really worth looking at. On a personal level I think it’s the online – face-to-face synergy that seems to create most and biggest impacts. That a key focus for us in our current work programmes.
Pingback: Tweets that mention The Time Economy | Izwe Project -- Topsy.com
Richard,
Nice post, I agree with much of what you say. A couple of thoughts…..
Have you come across micro-volunteering? Interesting idea…not sure of how practical it is, but suspect there is something in there.
The other thought, and this is maybe where I tend to take a slightly different line to you, is that building the big society, and even just raising socials action, doesn’t just mean increasing volunteering. Yes, people may be able to do more in voluntary capacity, but I also think we ought to be looking at creating more socially useful jobs….so that people who want to do more can do, but still sustain their livelihoods.
As two people who are paid to do charitable/socially useful work, I think we should aspire to help others to have the same privilege we enjoy.
This idea needs to be extended to the mainstream economy too, establishing more social businesses in financial services, construction, manufacturing, retail, etc etc….
I don’t think your wrong at all, I just think we need to extend our understanding of what big society means to be more than just volunteering.
Cheers
Toby
Hi Toby,
thanks so much for that post! Couldn’t agree more! I suppose I was just building on the established volunteering discourse.
Two things strike me in this area as key:
1) Breaking The Cycle of Business: getting us all (individuals & society) to be far more cognisant of how we use our time – and reflecting on this, far, far more.
2) 21C Volunteering: we need to massively broaden out how we define volunteering – 21C volunteering if you like covering everything that involves ‘doing good’ for no payment.
Richard, i’m reminded of something i read years ago….no idea who it was by?!?
about the effects of modernity and urban living on time and space – how they become compressed in modern (or post modern?) cities – which is why we’re all rushing around in town, whereas people in the countryside say hello to people they walk past…
it was some sociology thing or other. your comment about ‘being more cognisant of hwo we use our time’ just reminded me of it….
@Toby Blume were you thinking of Georg Simmel’s ‘The Metropolis and Mental Life’ by any chance?
Hi Richard,
It’s time for a radical solution: http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/21-hours
David
@Thom Townsend (apols for tardy reply) – yes, exactly!